Local Markets Heat up with Investors.

Survey: Local markets heat up with investors
CAMPBELL, Calif. – May 31, 2011 – Real estate investors, by three to one, will be more active in their local markets compared to typical homebuyers in the next 24 months; and 69 percent of investors say it’ll be easier to find properties in the near future, according to a survey of real estate investors released by Move, Inc., the management company overseeing Realtor.com.

The Move Investor survey suggests that local markets will be heating up with renewed investor interest and activity. Compared to a year ago, 62 percent of investors are paying more attention to home values in their local markets – only 43.5 percent say it will be harder to find bargains and 41.5 percent expect it to be easier to sell their properties in the next six months.

Meanwhile, 22 percent of investors are bullish and expect prices to rise in the next six to 12 months, and 53.5 percent expect prices to remain relatively the same. Twenty-three percent expect prices to fall in the next six to 12 months.

The Move Investor survey also found that investors are prepared to compete vigorously with traditional first-time homebuyers for hot deals. Two-thirds of investors (65.5 percent) said they expect that first-time buyers’ problems getting a mortgage will make it easier for investors to compete for properties. One in five investors (18.5 percent) say they’ll be cash-only buyers, a strategy that’s out of reach for most first-time buyers. Eight out of 10 (80.5 percent) expect cash discounts from sellers.

Today’s investors – not stereotypical, deal-driven flippers

Contrary to the tactics used by “flippers,” 50 percent of today’s real estate investors plan to hold their properties for five-plus years. Only 11 percent expect to sell within 12 months of purchase. Two-thirds (67.5 percent) say they’re investing for the long term.

Fifty-nine percent (59 percent) told Move they’re new to real estate investing, with 33.5 percent considering their first investment purchase and 8.5 percent in the process of buying and selling their first investment property. Another 17 percent said they just completed their first transaction and plan to make more. Only 36.5 percent have experience in more than one property transaction.

When it comes to repairs and maintenance, 56.5 percent of investors say the repair and maintenance of investment property has not been difficult. Moving forward, 42 percent plan to invest their own time and energy to improve, repair and maintain their properties. The rest said they’d hire a contractor for repairs (29.5 percent) or purchase move-in-ready properties (28 percent). The majority (65.7 percent), don’t expect repair costs to exceed 20 percent of the property’s purchase price.

“This data suggests today’s climate is hot for investing and is attracting a lot of new people that don’t fit the stereotypical deal-driven flippers that buy and sell properties quickly,” said Move, Inc. Chief Executive Officer Steve Berkowitz.

Investors combine cash and credit to snap up properties

While cash is king in many circles, 75.5 percent plan to combine cash and credit to purchase properties as they build their real estate portfolio. In fact, 59.5 percent plan to put less than half down on their next property purchase and they’ll finance the rest. Those planning to use more than 50 percent cash and finance the remainder account for 16 percent of today’s investors. Investors told Move the second most difficult challenge has been finding financing (57 percent).

“The fact that most real estate investors plan on combing cash and credit for their purchases goes against the conventional wisdom that investor transactions today are mostly cash-only sales,” says Berkowitz. “We were surprised to learn that 75 percent of investors are financing portions of their purchases. This suggests they’re seeing tremendous or once in a lifetime opportunities and may be tapping into credit or taking out second trusts on existing properties. The data also shows they’re expecting high returns to match the level of investment they’re making in an arena that is new to many investors.”

High risk leads to high ROI expectations

Based on the investments they’re making in today’s environment, real estate investors clearly expect high yield returns. Nearly half (48 percent) expect a profit of 20 percent or more from their property investments, a 4 percent annual rate of return over five years. Another 40 percent expect a profit of 10 percent, and only 6.5 percent expect a 5 percent or less return on investment. Half (50 percent) of today’s real estate investors plan to hold their properties for five-plus years.

Property investments gateway to homeownership for many

While the survey shows investors will outnumber traditional homebuyers three to one, nearly half (49 percent) plan to live in their investment property until it’s sold or turned into a rental property. Slightly more than half (56.5 percent) will put their investments to work as rental properties, and 28 percent plan to purchase vacation property that they’ll eventually sell. The Move Investor survey also found 30 percent of real estate investors are interested in buying retirement property as an investment.

“The survey suggests some first-time buyers may be looking at investing as a strategy to becoming homeowners,” Berkowitz said. “While today’s market is tough for some, it’s also motivating millions to take an unconventional approach and creatively search for new ways of entering the housing market.”

Increase proposed for FHA downpayments

WASHINGTON – May 25, 2011 – A Republican-led proposal circulated Monday would boost the downpayment requirement for mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration, a move that some industry experts said would shut potential homebuyers out of the market.

Borrowers who take out FHA-insured mortgages are permitted to put down as little as 3.5 percent, making those loans an especially attractive choice for first-time homebuyers. But as defaults rose during the housing market’s worst days, FHA’s cash reserves dwindled, creating concerns that taxpayers may have to come to the agency’s rescue.

The Republican proposal would require most FHA borrowers to put down at least 5 percent. Those who support the idea say that forcing borrowers to have more equity in their homes would better protect homeowners against default and thus improve the agency’s finances. The issue will be discussed Wednesday at a House Financial Services subcommittee hearing led by Rep. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.).

The proposal has not been formally introduced in legislative form. And it’s unlikely to gain traction without bipartisan support, said Jaret Seiberg, an analyst at MF Global Inc. But if enacted, its immediate impact on the housing market would be negative, he said. Gathering the upfront cash is often the biggest hurdle for those buying their first homes.

Demanding more money down “would make it even harder for first-time buyers to enter the housing market regardless of their incomes or earning potential,” Seiberg wrote in a note to clients Monday.

Mark A. Calabria, director of financial regulation studies at the Cato Institute, said larger downpayments would no doubt have some drag on the housing market. “But it’s a modest drag because it’s a fairly small change,” said Calabria, who is scheduled to testify at Wednesday’s hearing. “It’s a smart and reasonable thing to do.”

A similar Republican proposal stalled in the House last year after the Obama administration vehemently opposed it, warning that such an increase would undermine the already fragile housing market by shrinking the agency’s loan volume.

At a hearing last year, FHA Commissioner David H. Stevens told House lawmakers that raising the minimum downpayment to 5 percent would lower the agency’s loan volume by 40 percent in the next fiscal year and shut out 300,000 first-time homebuyers.

Since then, the FHA has raised its downpayment to 10 percent for borrowers with the poorest credit. In a report to Congress, the administration said it would consider raising FHA’s downpayment requirement as part of a broader effort to curb the government’s role in housing finance. Separately, the administration teamed up with banking regulators to propose a rule that would enable only those who put down 20 percent to get the lowest interest rates, though that rule does not apply to FHA borrowers.

The administration declined to comment Monday on the most recent Republican proposal. But at least one banking industry consultant, Brian Chappelle, plans to tell lawmakers Wednesday that the proposal is unnecessary, especially now that FHA has raised the fees it charges borrowers by 60 percent since 2008 and dramatically improved the credit quality of its borrowers in recent years.

Copyright © 2011 washingtonpost.com, Dina ElBoghdady

Fixed mortgage rates touch new low for 2011

NEW YORK – May 20, 2011 – Fixed mortgage rates fell this week to the lowest point of the year, offering incentive for homeowners to save money by refinancing their loans.

Freddie Mac said Thursday that the average rate on the 30-year loan fell to 4.61 percent. That’s down from 4.63 percent and the lowest level since mid-December.

The average rate on the 15-year fixed mortgage, a popular refinance option, slipped to 3.80 percent from 3.82 percent. That marked the lowest point since late November.

Rates track the yield on the 10-year Treasury note, which fell to the lowest level of the year this week.

Low rates haven’t been enough to jumpstart the weak housing market. Fewer people bought previously occupied homes in April, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday. Sales fell to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.05 million units, far below the 6 million homes a year that economists consider a healthy market.

However, the number of borrowers looking to refinance is now at the highest level since the second week of December, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Refinance activity has increased 33 percent over the last five weeks, mirroring the steady decline in rates.

Despite the gains, refinancing is only at half the level it reached in the fall of last year when mortgage rates fell to record lows. The rate on the 30-year home loan hit a four-decade low of 4.17 percent in November. The 15-year mortgage rate reached 3.57 percent that same month, the lowest level on records dating back to 1991.

“We’re not seeing a (refinancing) boom by any means,” said Pava Leyrer, president of Heritage National Mortgage in Michigan.

She said many borrowers refinanced when rates were lower last year. Others don’t have enough equity in their homes because values have fallen too much or their credit isn’t polished enough for them to qualify.

And those who may shave off a percentage point or more from their mortgage rate face higher closing costs this year because of a recent fee increase for appraisals, title insurance and other costs. That could offset any savings from an interest rate reduction.

“If it’s purely a rate decision, the difference needs to be one and a half percentage points,” said Ritch Workman, co-owner of Workman Mortgage in Melbourne, Fla.

Workman has noticed an uptick in applications for purchase mortgages. Would-be buyers are taking advantage of the combination of low rates and declining home prices.

To calculate average mortgage rates, Freddie Mac collects rates from lenders across the country on Monday through Wednesday of each week. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a single day.

The average rate on a five-year adjustable-rate mortgage rose to 3.48 percent from 3.41 percent. The five-year adjustable-rate loan hit 3.25 percent last month, the lowest rate on records dating back to January 2005.

The average rate on a one-year adjustable-rate loan also increased to 3.15 percent from 3.11 percent, the lowest level for the rate in the last year.

The rates do not include add-on fees, known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount. The average fee for the 30-year fixed loan and 15-year fixed loan in Freddie Mac’s survey was 0.7 point. The average fee for the five-year ARM and the 1-year ARM was 0.6 point.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press, Janna Herron (AP Real Estate Writer). All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

The 10 Most Walkable Cities

Buyers have expressed more preferences to walkable communities in home-shopping surveys. 

Walk Friendly Communities, a national recognition program, recently recognized the top places in the country for walking, taking into account such factors as safety, space in communities devoted to pedestrians, as well as whether walking is integrated into the city’s overall urban planning process. 

Here is its list of the top 10 most walkable cities:

1. Seattle, Wash. 
2. Ann Arbor, Mich.
3. Arlington, Va.
4. Hoboken, N.J.
5. Santa Barbara, Calif. 
6. Charlottesville, Va.
7. Decatur, Ga.
8. Austin, Texas
9. Charlotte, N.C.
10. Flagstaff, Ariz.

Source: “America’s Most Walkable Cities,” Forbes (May 6, 2011)

What Celebrities Desire in Homes

Daily Real Estate News  |  May 6, 2011  |   Share
What Celebrities Desire in Homes
Celebrities often have slightly different priorities when shopping for a home than the average home buyer. Here are a few top items often found on their priority list when home-shopping, according to the Zillow Blog.

1. Privacy. Most often a top priority, celebrities usually want a gated, secured home. “It’s a huge issue,” says Jade Mills, a Coldwell Banker real estate pro who has worked with actress Jennifer Aniston. “They want to be able to come home and get away from the paparazzi and want privacy when they go into their yard. They usually have foliage [and] hedges so that people can’t look in.” Ultra-privacy goes for condos too. For example, Aniston recently bought a penthouse condo in New York City, as well as the floor directly beneath it, to ensure more privacy.

2. Giant closets. Celebs can’t hold all of that glam without lots of oversized closets. “A lot of the female celebrities and even the male, love giant closets—over-the-top closets—because they have a tremendous amount of clothes,” says Gary Gold of Hilton & Hyland in Beverly Hills. Some celebrities may even convert extra rooms into expansive, customized closets.

3. Home theaters. They also want a comfortable place to view themselves on screen. Home theaters are often high on their priority list, says Mauricio Umansky of Hilton & Hyland in Los Angeles. “They’re in that business and they expect it,” Umansky says.

4. Hobby rooms. Celebrities also tend to like flexible spaces--rooms that are blank slates that they can transform into whatever they desire, whether that’s a hair salon, home office, or even a guest house. “Each [celebrity] has their own thing and needs a hobby room, a studio, a dark room, or a computer room,” Umansky says.

But, of course, celebrities--just like any other buyer--may have a few odd requests from time to time too. Gold says he once had to try to find a place for a celebrity that could accommodate his 9-month-old, 160-pound mountain lion.

Source: “What Do Celebrities Want in a Home?” Zillow Blog (May 2, 2011)

Landlords Say They'll Rent to the Foreclosed

Daily Real Estate News  |  May 4, 2011  |    Share

Landlords Say They'll Rent to the Foreclosed 
Eighty-two percent of independent landlords say they would rent to someone who had lost a home in foreclosure, if the applicant had otherwise good credit, according to a new survey by The National Association of Independent Landlords.

"Landlords typically won't rent to applicants with poor credit--and a foreclosure will absolutely slam someone's scores,” says Tracey Benson, president of The National Association of Independent Landlords. “The exception is when they see people who have paid their bills their whole life, but lost their job, can't meet their mortgage and must hand their keys back to the bank.”

Benson says that applicants with a foreclosure aren’t necessarily bad credit risks. “Often, they lost their jobs and homes through no fault of their own," she says.

As such, "because of this abundance of defaults, there is a greater need for rental property, so landlords should carefully vet applicants," Benson says, adding that landlords should do a thorough background check to determine whether defaulting applicants were a victim to financial woes or following a lifelong trend of not paying bills.

Source: “Most Landlords Say They Would Rent to People Who Lost Homes to Foreclosure, The National Association of Independent Landlords Finds,” PRNewswire (April 20, 2011)

Buyers Bypass 'Fixer-Upper,' Want Move-in Ready

Daily Real Estate News  |  May 3, 2011  |   Share
Buyers Bypass 'Fixer-Upper,' Want Move-in Ready
More buyers are shunning “as-is” properties in favor of homes that are in move-in condition, according to real estate professionals and recent surveys.

For example, a Coldwell Banker survey recently found that 87 percent of first-time buyers say they desire a “move-in” ready home.

“This is absolutely the story of this market. It seems buyers will pay a premium, engage in a bidding war, and even overpay just to avoid buying a ‘project’ house,” says Beth Freed of Terrie O’Connor REALTORS® in Ridgewood, N.J.

As such, real estate pros are advising their sellers to fix up their homes for quicker sales. “There is no question homes that have been spruced up for the market sell quicker,” says Kate Conover with RE/MAX in Saddle River, N.J.

That doesn’t mean major, costly renovations that sellers won’t likely get back on the sale price either, she says. Instead of a major kitchen or bath renovation, just repainting the home or removing the clutter can go a long way in freshening up a home. Also, don’t forget about curb appeal: Freshen up the flowerpots, trim the bushes, and paint the front door, if it’s starting to show wear and tear.

Also with buyers wanting “move-in” ready homes, real estate pros say it’s crucial that sellers address any major maintenance and safety issues—such as leaky roofs—before the home even goes on the market.

Source: “Home Buyers Shun ‘Fixer-Uppers,” RISMedia (May 2, 2011)

Bailing on Mortgage Not a Good Idea

Daily Real Estate News  |  May 2, 2011  |   Share
Bailing on Mortgage Not a Good Idea
An estimated 11 million home owners owe more on their mortgage than their property is currently worth. That’s made more home owners consider walking away from their mortgage and home ownership, even those who can still comfortably afford to make their payments (known as “strategic default”).

Walking away from a mortgage usually results in either a short sale or foreclosure. So what are the consequences of walking away? There may be far more consequences than what most home owners ever considered.

The consequences include everything from badly affected credit to potential tax consequences and deficiency risks. There are even possible professional implications, Justin McHood with Academy Mortgage in Chandler, Ariz., warns in an article at Zillow.com.

Home owners' credit scores will be badly hit regardless of whether they attempt a short sale or have their property foreclosed on. (See How Missed Mortgage Payments Hurt Credit Scores)

There also could be the potential for deficiency risks when walking away from a home, which largely varies from state to state. (View anti-deficiency laws by state.) In some states, lenders may sue you for the difference between what you owe and what your short-sale or foreclosure proceeds are, McHood notes.

Home owners considering walking away also should weigh the potential difficulty they may face from moving too. For example, if moving into a rental property, they’ll have to convince a landlord to rent to them after they have the red flag of missed mortgage payments on their credit record. And paying for moving expenses — which many walkaways fail to consider — can quickly add up too.

Plus, home owners may find professional consequences from walking away from a mortgage, as the number of employers eyeing employees’ credit profiles continues to grow.

Source: “The Consequence of Walking Away,” Zillow.com (April 27, 2011)