Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Foreclosure rescue scam reports increase, new study says

Foreclosure rescue scam reports increase, new study says
VIENNA, Va. – June 22, 2010 – The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) released its first analysis of suspicious activity reports containing information about potential foreclosure rescue scams. The report, “Loan Modification and Foreclosure Rescue Scams – Evolving Trends and Patterns in Bank Secrecy Act Reporting,” analyzed more than 3,500 SARs filed from 2004 through 2009, with the great majority of those reports (3,000) filed last year.

“The increase in reporting of suspected foreclosure rescue scam activity could mean that there is an increase in fraudulent activity, but it also reflects an increase in awareness among financial institutions of the fraud perpetrated,” said FinCEN Director James H. Freis Jr.

Along with the increase in reported activity, the analysis found that the nature of foreclosure rescue scams shifted too. The latest scams reflect more advance-fee schemes, in which the alleged loan modification or foreclosure rescue specialists say they’ll arrange modification of a homeowner’s mortgage for more favorable repayment terms. Once the scammers receive large advance fees, they rarely, if ever, provide any service.

A variation of the advance fee scam involves phony debt elimination programs, in which the homeowners paid advance fees and are given bogus documents or instructed to contact their lenders with specious assertions that the original mortgage debt is illegal.

According to the latest FinCEN analysis, the top 10 metropolitan regions, ranked by the concentration of local subjects of all mortgage loan fraud suspicious activity reports tracked between Jan. 1, 2009 and June 10, 2010, are:

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL, came in ranked as No. 1; Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA, No. 2; New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA, No. 3; Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI, No. 4; Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, No. 5; Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, No. 6; Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ, No. 7; Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA, No. 8; San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA, No. 9; and Orlando-Kissimmee, FL, No. 10.

© 2010 Florida Realtors®

Monday, June 21, 2010

Squatters take over homes, causes housing crisis

Squatters take over homes, causes housing crisis
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) – June 21, 2010 – Imagine going to a house or condo you own and finding a stranger living there who claims the property no longer belongs to you.

It’s happening across Florida and other parts of the country through what authorities say is abuse of a centuries-old concept known as adverse possession.

Dating back to Renaissance England, adverse possession allowed people to take over abandoned cottages and farmland, provided they were willing to live there and pay the taxes. These days, officials say, the legal doctrine is being misused by squatters, trespassers and swindlers to claim ownership of vacant or foreclosed homes.

In Broward and Palm Beach counties alone, adverse possession claims have been filed on some 200 homes in recent months. Three of the four people behind the claims have been arrested, and police are investigating the fourth man, who along with his father, a convicted mobster, tried to take over properties in Hollywood.

“We look at this as another con job, another get-rich-quick scheme,” said Don TenBrook, a Broward state prosecutor of economic crimes. “You’re starting to see them pop up all over the place. It’s been spawned by the real estate crisis.”

A bill in the Legislature this spring would have helped cut back on the abuses and better protect Florida property owners, but it failed to pass – the result of political retribution, state Rep. Ron Schultz, one of the sponsors, told the Sun Sentinel.

“We tried to nip this in the bud, but that didn’t quite work,” said the Republican from Homosassa. “This is becoming a fairly wide scam in Florida.”

Antonio Vurro owned an empty rental home in Sunrise that he was trying to sell when he discovered in February that someone had moved in, changed the locks and was trying to open a utility account.

“There were boxes all over the place and a mattress in each room,” Vurro said in a recent interview. “This is not right. It’s my house.”

The occupant, Fitzroy Ellis, told Vurro he was entitled to take over the home because it was abandoned. Police disagreed, and Ellis, 64, is now in the Broward County Jail charged with six counts of grand theft.

Ellis tried to claim a total of 48 properties in Broward, including a $1 million house in Coral Springs, through a company he formed called Helping Hands Properties Inc., county official records show. He told a Plantation police detective he planned to rent out the houses and condos and could offer tenants a good price “since he didn’t have to pay anything for the homes,” according to a police report.

Ellis, who is representing himself, wrote in court documents that the allegations against him are “false and an abuse of power.”

Another South Florida man, Mark Guerette of Wellington, filed notice in official county records that he was taking possession of 100 homes in Broward and three in the Palm Beach community of Lake Worth through Saving Florida Homes Inc. and two other companies. On one day last November, he filed takeover notices on 10 condos in the same North Lauderdale complex at 1200 SW 52nd Ave., records show.

Police say Guerette, 46, rented out six of the properties and collected more than $20,000 from tenants before he was arrested in April. He has pleaded not guilty to a charge of organized scheme to defraud.

His lawyer, Robert Shearin, said Guerette is nothing more than a good Samaritan, rescuing blighted homes.

“The banks are letting these properties go down the tubes,” Shearin said. “Here’s a guy trying to help out, and he ends up in jail.”

New twist, old law

The attempted takeovers are more fallout from Florida’s declining housing market, said Dennis Koehler, a West Palm Beach lawyer.

“People who are upside down just choose to leave the property, let it sit,” he said. “Some people have decided, ‘Hey, this is an opportunity for me.’ “

The opportunity involves a new twist on a very old law, dating to 16th-century England. Adverse possession allows non-owners of a property to eventually take ownership if they pay the taxes, occupy, maintain and improve the land for a period of years – seven in Florida. The purpose was to prevent abandoned properties from sitting idle with no one paying taxes on them.

It’s been used mostly to take over abandoned farmland or settle boundary disputes, such as a fence or building encroaching on a neighbor’s property.

In theory, vacant houses can also be taken through adverse possession, if the seven-year window passes and the property owner makes no attempt to pay the taxes or liens – an unlikely scenario, especially when a bank is laying claim through foreclosure, property experts say.

And claimants risk breaking other laws if they trespass, break into a home or try to collect rent without being the actual property owner.

Even if someone claiming adverse possession manages to legally occupy a home and pay taxes on it, “an owner could come in the sixth or seventh year and say, ‘I want my property back,’” Koehler said.

Koehler said he was hired by a West Palm Beach man, Carl Heflin, to provide legal advice on taking over homes through adverse possession. Koehler told the Sun Sentinel that he outlined a series of steps Heflin would need to take and stressed that he “couldn’t just move in and squat.”

But that’s exactly what Heflin did, according to the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.

Beginning in December 2008, Heflin filed adverse possession notices on properties in West Palm Beach and even submitted deeds declaring ownership of 27 of them, police and court records show. He also moved his computer into a law office of a now disbarred attorney and changed the locks, the records say.

“When he told me about that,” Koehler said, “I dropped him as a client like a hot potato.”

Danielle Rubio said Heflin duped her into believing he was a legitimate landlord and in April 2009, she rented a three-bedroom home from him. The home was in disrepair, Rubio said, and Heflin’s ex-wife Cheryl collected a deposit with the promise to fix it up.

Rubio and her family spent just a few hours in the house when her 2-year-old son got sick from mold and was hospitalized, she said. Seeing little progress on the home in the following days, Rubio said she started checking Heflin out and tracked down the owner of record, who told her the house was in foreclosure and he had no tenants.

Rubio said Heflin refused to return her money, about $1,200, and she moved her family in with a relative.

“We were with my aunt two months before we could save enough to get a place,” she said. “We gave all the money to (the Heflins).”

Heflin, 52, was arrested last summer and is scheduled for trial June 21 on multiple counts, including organized scheme to defraud. Two associates, George Chambers and Sue Ann Smith, pleaded guilty in March to petty theft and as a condition of their probation must testify against Heflin.

Heflin and his attorney could not be reached for comment. Heflin’s ex-wife has not been charged and declined to comment. “I don’t care to speak to you about any of this,” she said.

“It’s scary that people can just take your money without even thinking about it,” Rubio said. “We never thought we would ever be in something like that. The paperwork looked legitimate.”

Ex-cons involved

Similar problems have occurred in Florida’s St. Lucie and Pasco counties, in Las Vegas, Nev., and southern California.

A squatter citing adverse possession took up residence last month in the former home of the mayor of Deltona in Volusia County. The house had been foreclosed on and sold when a woman moved in, hooked up cable television and refused to leave until sheriff’s deputies forced her out and gave her a trespass warning.

In South Florida, those trying to take properties have included people with criminal records, experience in real estate, or both.

Heflin told a sheriff’s detective he had “always been interested in real estate” and worked in 2007 for a company that secured foreclosed properties for banks.

Guerette had been an officer in property management, mortgage funding and real estate companies, corporation records show. He was convicted of misdemeanor and felony theft charges in 1994.

Adverse possession even lured a Hollywood man with ties to the mob.

Joseph Spitaleri was a member of the Trafficante organized crime family when he was convicted of racketeering in 2001, sentenced to nearly five years in federal prison and ordered to repay $1.7 million. He was one of 19 people named in a wide-ranging indictment that included charges of laundering money through mob-controlled check-cashing stores in Broward County.

In February, Spitaleri filed adverse possession notices on 14 Hollywood homes and one in Fort Lauderdale through Saving Florida Neighborhoods Inc. His son, Michael, claimed 13 other properties through his company, MAS & Son Inc., records show.

Joseph Spitaleri withdrew his claims in March, and his son gave up all but four of his last month.

One of the homes Joseph Spitaleri claimed ownership of is on Hollywood’s South Lake and is currently under contract to be sold for $1.2 million, said real estate agent Mike Harris. He said he learned of the adverse claim through another Realtor, and the owner’s attorney “contacted the outfit that was trying to steal this property” and cleared the title.

Joseph Spitaleri could not be reached, but was “not really involved” in the adverse possession claims, his son said.

“I canceled everything (for him) and had it all in my name,” Michael Spitaleri said. He declined to answer further questions.

Hollywood police are investigating Michael Spitaleri’s property claims, said spokesman Lt. Manny Marino.

Politics killed solution

For property owners, consequences of adverse possession can be costly. A claim can cloud the title and affect future sales, forcing the owner to hire an attorney and in some cases go to court.

One Polk County nursery owner has spent more money fighting an adverse possession claim than his property is worth, said county Property Appraiser Marsha Faux. Polk holds the state record for the most adverse possession claims 613 – many in unplatted subdivisions that are delinquent in their property taxes.

“Most are foreign owners, and they thought one day it might be developed and it would be close to (Walt Disney World) and they’d make a fortune,” Faux said. Others are properties in use by the actual owners but someone beat them to paying the property tax bill, she said.

The judiciary committee of the Florida Senate warned of the potential abuses of adverse possession last fall. Rep. Schultz, a former property appraiser, introduced legislation to stop them, including requiring all property owners to be notified when a claim is made and preventing non-owners from paying a tax bill until it becomes delinquent.

The bill, co-sponsored by Sen. Paula Dockery, cleared the Senate unanimously but died in the House the last day of the legislative session, April 30.

Schultz said a House leader told him the sponsors were the problem. Dockery, a Republican from Lakeland, was running for governor, but the preferred candidate of the House leadership was Attorney General Bill McCollum, Schultz said.

And Schultz said he angered leaders by voting against their priorities, including bills tying teacher pay to student test scores and requiring pregnant women to get an ultrasound before an abortion.

“When you are the lone ‘no’ vote among Republicans, you can expect to be noticed, and your bills have a certain aroma,” Schultz said. “I was quite disappointed. It was a general purpose, anti-fraud bill and it didn’t get a hearing.”

Palm Beach County Property Appraiser Gary Nikolits said the “political payback” has hurt all Floridians.

The proposed law “had statewide consequences and had benefit for all taxpayers,” he said, “so shame on the leadership.”

AP LogoCopyright © 2010 The Associated Press

Friday, June 18, 2010

Freddie Mac: Mortgage rates up from yearly low

Freddie Mac: Mortgage rates up from yearly low
Mortgage Rate Trend Index
Don’t expect much change over the near term on mortgage rates, say 65% of the industry experts polled by Bankrate.com this week. However, if there is a change, 35% say it will be an increase; none expect further drops.


NEW YORK – June 18, 2010 – Rates on 30-year fixed mortgages backed off from yearly lows this week but still remain historically cheap.

Mortgage finance company Freddie Mac says the average rate rose to 4.75 percent, up from 4.72 percent last week. The rate hit 4.71 percent in December, the lowest since Freddie Mac began keeping records in 1971.

The average rate on a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage edged up to 4.2 percent, an increase from its all-time low of 4.17 percent set last week.

A Federal Reserve program to reduce borrowing costs for consumers pushed rates down to extraordinarily low levels last year. Rates were expected to rise after the campaign ended this spring, but have declined instead over the past two months as investors shifted money into the safety of U.S. Treasury bonds.

Concerns over the European debt crisis and the volatile stock market have made U.S. Treasury debt more attractive. And mortgage rates tend to follow the yield on U.S. Treasury debt.

Low mortgage rates could help buoy housing demand after the expiration of federal tax credits. First-time buyers could get a credit of up to $8,000, while current owners who bought and moved into another home could qualify for a credit of up to $6,500. Buyers had until April 30 to get a signed sales contract and until June 30 to complete the sale.

Home sales started to lag after the credits’ deadline. But a recent report offered a sign that buyers are finally taking advantage of low rates. The number of customers applying for refinance and purchase mortgages climbed 18 percent last week after falling sharply the month before, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Wednesday.

Freddie Mac collects mortgage rates on Monday through Wednesday of each week from lenders around the country. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a given day.

Rates on five-year, adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 3.89 percent, down from 3.92 percent a week earlier. Rates on one-year, adjustable-rate mortgages fell to 3.82 percent from 3.91 percent. That was the lowest average since May 2004.

The rates do not include add-on fees known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount.

The nationwide fee for loans in Freddie Mac’s survey averaged 0.7 a point for 30-year, 15-year and 5-year loans. The average fee for 1-year loans was 0.6 of a point.
AP Logo Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press

Monday, June 14, 2010

Freddie Mac: Mortgage rates hit low for year

Freddie Mac: Mortgage rates hit low for year
Mortgage Rate Trend Index
No experts polled by Bankrate.com expect mortgage rates to go lower, but a majority (56%) doesn’t expect much change over the short term. The remaining 44%, however, predict an increase.
WASHINGTON – June 11, 2010 – Rates on 30-year fixed mortgages fell this week to the lowest level of the year and barely shy of the all-time low.

Mortgage finance company Freddie Mac says the average rate sank to 4.72 percent, down from 4.79 percent last week. It was just above the record of 4.71 set last December.

The average rate on a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage hit 4.17 percent, down from 4.2 percent last week and the lowest on records dating back to August 1991.

Though mortgage rates are at attractive levels, the housing market hasn’t benefited. The number of customers applying for a mortgage to purchase a property fell to the lowest level in 13 years last week and was down 35 percent from a month ago, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

That’s a sign the market is struggling without a tax credit of up to $8,000 for first-time buyers, which expired at the end of April.

The government has taken massive steps to help the housing market recover. A campaign by the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs for consumers pushed rates down to extraordinarily low levels last year. Rates were expected to rise after the program ended this spring, but have fallen instead over the past two months.

Investors, wary of the European debt crisis and the turbulent stock market, have shifted money into the safety of U.S. Treasury bonds. That has pushed down the interest rate, or yield, on U.S. Treasury debt. Fixed mortgage rates tend to track that yield.

More recently, the latest report on the U.S. employment picture showed that few private-sector jobs are being created. That made investors nervous about the stock market and pushed up bond prices, which pulls down rates.

“Following a relatively weak employment report, bond yields fell this week and mortgage rates followed,” said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac’s chief economist.

Freddie Mac collects mortgage rates on Monday through Wednesday of each week from lenders around the country. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a given day.

Rates on five-year, adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 3.92 percent, down from 3.94 percent a week earlier. Rates on one-year, adjustable-rate mortgages fell to 3.91 percent from 3.95 percent. That was the lowest average since May 2004.

The rates do not include add-on fees known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount.

The nationwide fee for loans in Freddie Mac’s survey averaged 0.7 a point for 30-year, 15-year and 5-year loans. The average fee for 1-year loans was 0.6 of a point.

AP LogoCopyright 2010 The Associated Press

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Homeowners to get help with troubled loans

Homeowners to get help with troubled loans
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – June 10, 2010 – To reduce the number of foreclosure cases burdening the courts, the Florida Supreme Court ordered judges in the Sunshine State to implement a mediation program.

The 12th Judicial Circuit covering Sarasota and Manatee counties has become the 10th to do so. Beginning June 21, owners of homestead properties in foreclosure will have an opportunity to talk about interest rate reductions, short sales, and other alternatives to foreclosure with lender representatives. Mediators familiar with lenders’ past offerings to distressed borrowers will participate in the meeting, and judges will dismiss cases if the two parties come to an agreement.

Florida had the third highest rate of distressed properties in 2009, with foreclosure notices given to one of every 19 homeowners in the two counties. A Collins Center report on pilot programs in three judicial circuits over a year-long period indicates that attorneys for banks and lenders often are too busy to notify the mediation program of foreclosure lawsuits, and when notifications have been made, only 50 percent of homeowners have been contacted.

However, approximately 67 percent of homeowners who participated forged agreements with their lenders, although most lenders are not offering principal reductions.

Source: Sarasota Herald-Tribune (FL

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Proposal: Property tax breaks for Gulf owners

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – June 9, 2010 –Gulf coast property owners impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill could get a property tax break. Gov. Charlie Crist wants that issue to be discussed as part of a special session of the Florida Legislature that he hopes to call as early as next month.

Chief Financial Officer Alex Sink pushed Crist to embrace the tax reduction plan Tuesday as the governor and Cabinet heard presentations about the effects of the massive spill from BP, and state environmental, wildlife and revenue officials.

The economic impact of the spill – which a University of Central Florida economist estimates as potentially $2.2 billion to as much as $10 billion – is proving difficult to gauge.

“This is going to be an incredibly complex legal tangle to untangle, and to ensure that everybody is compensated fairly,” said Sink, who said she’s been advising businesses, individuals and city and county governments to carefully document losses stemming from the encroaching oil.

The tax-break proposal emerged in a joint letter to Crist from property appraisers in the Panhandle’s Santa Rosa and Escambia counties. They said that property owners are likely to endure a loss in value this year because of the spill but will face tax payments this fall based on assessments in place at the start of 2010.

“We are concerned for the taxpayers of our respective counties who are already struggling with the economic downturn and the resulting declining property values,” Gregory Brown, of Santa Rosa, and Chris Jones, of Escambia, told Crist. “When property values decline along the coast due to BP’s negligence, the affected citizens should be allowed some adjustment to their tax burden.”

Tinkering with property taxes is not new. Property tax relief has followed five disasters already, according to Lisa Echeverri, executive director of the state’s Revenue Department. The most recent property-tax break was issued to Central Florida counties battered by tornadoes in 2007.

But those relief efforts may have proved easier to implement. The 2007 legislation offered as much as $1,500 in property-tax reimbursements to residents whose houses were destroyed or heavily damaged in the tornadoes. By contrast, losses stemming from a lack of tourists coming to commercial properties or the diminished value of residential or vacant land may prove tougher to calculate, officials acknowledge.

Similarly, the loss of tax revenue to state and local government caused by the spill could require lawmakers to approve a scheme for distributing dollars coming from BP. The company Tuesday promised Florida another $25 million – on top of an earlier $25 million issued the state.

Crist has sought as much as $200 million from the company to offset damage, for advertising and continued coastal monitoring.

“We’re trying to figure out how the models may need to be adjusted,” Echeverri said of state revenue forecasts that could be shaken by the disaster. Economists were anticipating a $6 billion budget shortfall next year before the Gulf spill changed some variables.

Crist has been pushing lawmakers for a special session in order to create a proposed constitutional amendment to put on the November ballot that would ban oil drilling in Florida waters. So far, the call for a special session has been rejected by House leaders, including incoming House Speaker Dean Cannon (R-Winter Park).

Cannon sponsored legislation in 2009 that would have allowed drilling as close as three miles offshore and this spring conducted public hearings that minimized the risks of oil and gas exploration.

Crist also wants the special session to include a discussion on ways Florida can draw at least 20 percent of its energy needs from wind, solar and other renewable energy sources within 10 years.

But pulling temporary property tax relief into the session may finally give him an issue an otherwise reluctant, Republican-led Legislature can embrace this election year.

Source: News Service of Florida, John Kennedy

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Should you buy or rent?

Should you buy or rent?
WASHINGTON – June 7, 2010 – To rent or to buy? For millions of Americans, that is the question. The recent housing boom and subsequent bust seem to provide a clear answer – that given an affordable mortgage, we would all rather be buyers.

With the piercing clarity that is 20-20 hindsight, many people burned by the mortgage market may now think differently. After all, you can’t be foreclosed on if you don’t own in the first place. For them, renting has become not only the smart move, but also the sensible one.

“Many Americans are questioning if homeownership is an inherent element of their dream,” says Tara-Nicholle Nelson, real estate consumer advocate for real estate website Trulia.

Part of that dream is also based on economic common sense. Besides stability and status, owning a home can help build equity, improve credit ratings, and be a tax deduction. Given these benefits, the dream of homeownership is hard to give up. Much as sales of pickups and SUVs are rebounding, Americans seem to need only the slightest nudge to jump back into the housing market. In April, sales of existing homes rose 7.6 percent nationwide, according to the National Association of Realtors. For new homes, sales surged 14.8 percent, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

Measuring rents vs. sales prices

In some markets, however, people are better off renting. That’s because in these areas, the cost of buying a new home is still prohibitive, especially given tighter lending standards. To determine which urban areas are best for renters and which are best for buyers, Trulia surveyed the country’s 50 largest cities.

“We took current list prices of the average cost to rent or own a two-bedroom apartment, condo, or town home in a city and divided it by one year’s rents,” says Nelson. Trulia broke the data into three categories and scored each city on a price-to-rent ratio ranging from 1 up to more than 21. If the price-to-rent ratio is between 1 and 15 – that is, if the price to buy is only one to 15 times prevailing rents – it’s much less expensive to own than to rent. If the ratio is between 16 and 20, owning a home is more expensive but might still make financial sense, depending on the individual situation. If the ratio is higher than 21, the total costs of owning a home are much greater than the costs of renting.

With a price-to-rent ratio of 33, New York City is highest on the list. The average cost to rent a two-bedroom apartment was $3,537 and to buy a comparable unit was $1,383,612. The next highest city, Omaha, came in at 26, where the average cost to rent a two-bedroom was $870 and to buy was $275,844. At the opposite end of the spectrum, with a price-to-rent ratio of 8, is Minneapolis, where an average two-bedroom unit rented for $1,699 and sold for $153,843.

Of course, more expensive, high-end homes are on the market in Minneapolis, but “you can own a house [here] very easily for less than you pay for rent,” says Aaron Dickinson, a broker at Edina Realty in Plymouth, Minn.

Some rebounding sales prices

Dickinson says prices in many areas are still below peak levels and may have hit bottom – prices have been increasing the past four months after falling for more than 40 months, according to the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. One of the most dramatic changes came in North Minneapolis, where the median sale price in April jumped 171 percent year-on-year, to $64,000, he says. It is one of the city’s older neighborhoods, adjacent to downtown, with smaller homes targeted for first-time buyers. Dickinson adds that the area was hit badly by foreclosures, so the resurgence is relative.

Even in a city as expensive as New York, some argue now is the best time to buy. Neil Binder, principal of the Bellmarc Companies, says that for those who can afford to own, renting is not the better option. “Not with 5 percent interest rates. If we had a different market, and prices were higher, and interest rates were higher, it would be a different story.”

Don’t be shy about negotiating

For the millions of New Yorkers who can’t afford to buy, or choose not to, renting in the city offers other advantages. Many developers overbuilt during the boom; rather than be stuck with empty apartments, many have been willing to negotiate rent reductions and shorter leases. According to Miller Samuel, the average rental for two-bedroom units in Manhattan dropped 6.6 percent year-on-year in this year’s first quarter, although brokers expect overall rental prices to stabilize for the remainder of the year.

Of course, many considerations other than price are involved – many see the flexibility of renting as a major advantage. Beth Sievers, a sales representative at the New York brokerage Bellmarc Realty, says one client who recently sold his Midtown co-op decided to rent instead, in order to stay liquid while he started his own business. He also wanted to avoid the difficulties that come with being approved by a co-op board, she says.

Another consideration: Renting might also be a better option until the economy fully recovers.

“For most people, now is not a good time to buy, for lack of security in people’s jobs,” says Mike Colpitts, editor of real estate forecaster Housingpredictor.com. While most analysts believe the New York market will stabilize, depending on employment, Colpitts holds a contrarian view: He expects housing prices in Manhattan to deflate by 13.8 percent this year as more foreclosures enter the market and properties remain overpriced.

Jerry Weigand, a commodity broker, also recently switched to renting after selling his Upper East Side apartment. He now lives in a two-bedroom unit for $6,500 per month. A newlywed, he says he and his wife wanted to try a different neighborhood. Their decision to rent was driven more by the desire for a new experience than by economics. He says they will look to buy again in a few years.

“I do feel that prices have a little way to go down, but not by a lot,” Weigand says. “And I don’t think they will rise by a lot like they did a few years ago.”

Copyright © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Cos